81. Search in Rotated Sorted Array II
Description
There is an integer array nums sorted in non-decreasing order (not necessarily with distinct values).
Before being passed to your function, nums is rotated at an unknown pivot index k (0 <= k < nums.length) such that the resulting array is [nums[k], nums[k+1], ..., nums[n-1], nums[0], nums[1], ..., nums[k-1]] (0-indexed). For example, [0,1,2,4,4,4,5,6,6,7] might be rotated at pivot index 5 and become [4,5,6,6,7,0,1,2,4,4].
Given the array nums after the rotation and an integer target, return true if target is in nums, or false if it is not in nums.
You must decrease the overall operation steps as much as possible.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [2,5,6,0,0,1,2], target = 0 Output: true
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,5,6,0,0,1,2], target = 3 Output: false
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 5000-104 <= nums[i] <= 104numsis guaranteed to be rotated at some pivot.-104 <= target <= 104
Follow up: This problem is similar to Search in Rotated Sorted Array, but nums may contain duplicates. Would this affect the runtime complexity? How and why?
Solutions
Solution 1: Binary Search
We define the left boundary $l=0$ and the right boundary $r=n-1$ for the binary search, where $n$ is the length of the array.
During each binary search process, we get the current midpoint $mid=(l+r)/2$.
- If $nums[mid] \gt nums[r]$, it means that $[l,mid]$ is ordered. At this time, if $nums[l] \le target \le nums[mid]$, it means that $target$ is in $[l,mid]$, otherwise $target$ is in $[mid+1,r]$.
- If $nums[mid] \lt nums[r]$, it means that $[mid+1,r]$ is ordered. At this time, if $nums[mid] \lt target \le nums[r]$, it means that $target$ is in $[mid+1,r]$, otherwise $target$ is in $[l,mid]$.
- If $nums[mid] = nums[r]$, it means that the elements $nums[mid]$ and $nums[r]$ are equal. At this time, we cannot determine which interval $target$ is in, so we can only decrease $r$ by $1$.
After the binary search ends, if $nums[l] = target$, it means that the target value $target$ exists in the array, otherwise it means it does not exist.
The time complexity is approximately $O(\log n)$, and the space complexity is $O(1)$. Here, $n$ is the length of the array.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
